MSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 227%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics193% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive332% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A39
MotherboardMSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)  (all builds)
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 14:01
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Memory 84.1
1-Core 145
2-Core 291
94% 173 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 1,170
103% 874 Pts
64-Core 2,752
170% 2,752 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$550
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
193% Outstanding
Lighting 271
Reflection 261
Parallax 275
220% 269 fps
MRender 361
Gravity 239
Splatting 190
207% 263 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 193%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
793GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1980 2028 2028 2134 2146 2152 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
332% Outstanding
Read 1,801
Write 2,190
Mixed 1,866
SusWrite 2,078
449% 1,984 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 81.4
271% 96.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,177
DQ Write 1,005
DQ Mixed 1,085
815% 1,089 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 332%
Great: 365%
Intel SSDSC2KW180H6 180GB
127GB free
Firmware: LSF036C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 87 85 80 83 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 481
Write 416
Mixed 381
SusWrite 100
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 41
141% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 134
128% 202 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
117GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 93 93 91 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 102
Write 106
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 92.1
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 109%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 750GB
85GB free
Firmware: JB2OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 123 121 124 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 123
Write 131
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 124
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 74%
WD Elements 2TB
84GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 55 56 55 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 58.2
Write 60.5
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 55.3
72% 53.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 44%
WD Elements 25A1 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 114 114 116 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 121
Write 105
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 114
140% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 0.8
263% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 78.1
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 39.1
147% 51.6 GB/s
SC Read 28.4
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 36.7
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 134%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 12 60 27" 1920 1017 IVM6662 PL2740HS
Typical B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) Builds (Compare 1,791 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback