Acer Aspire TC-780

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 months ago, 13 days ago.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-780  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-780(KBL)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170221
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 13:39
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 190
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 293
42% 310 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 144
Parallax 132
105% 135 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 134
Splatting 118
100% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBK3U5000ANC 500GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411040RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 484
Write 423
Mixed 258
86% 388 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 42.4
144% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 205
186% 286 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 116%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$363
2.5TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 491
Write 445
Mixed 433
102% 456 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 53.4
172% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 331
249% 333 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 137%
Seagate Expansion HDD 16TB
173GB free
Firmware: 1801
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 41
Write 40.6
Mixed 36.6
9% 39.4 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 7.7 MB/s
DQ Read 0.1
DQ Write 13.3
DQ Mixed 0.3
2% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 41%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
28GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 400
Write 11.4
Mixed 19.4
104% 144 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
35% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 26.8
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 24.7
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM71B5 SAMSUNG
Typical Aspire TC-780 Builds (Compare 1,598 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback