TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus PRIME B450M-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B450M-A II  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230616
Uptime35.4 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 07:31
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 71.5
1-Core 136
2-Core 273
86% 160 Pts
4-Core 521
8-Core 868
85% 694 Pts
64-Core 1,066
66% 1,066 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 84.3%
 Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6393)
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 186
Parallax 193
139% 183 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 174
Splatting 124
116% 143 fps
Poor: 109% ↑
This bench: 125%
 Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
731GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1873 1954 1976 2068 2039 2053 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 1715
Write 1,893
Mixed 1,869
SusWrite 1,994
423% 1,868 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 83.4
278% 99.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,195
DQ Write 937
DQ Mixed 1,039
785% 1,057 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑
This bench: 324%
 Great: 365%
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$52
30GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 203 107 78 79 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 371
Write 209
Mixed 237
SusWrite 132
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 99.6
4K Mixed 49
158% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 280
222% 311 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 87.1%
 Great: 105%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 151 144 154 148 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 133
Write 129
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 150
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 81.2%
 Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
148GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 111 118 111 113 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 102
Write 147
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 112
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 61.7%
 Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-2133C15-8GVR 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.2% Good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 26.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 23.7
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 98.7
40% 98.7 ns
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 67.2%
 Great: 95%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 27" 1280 720 SAM71E1 LS27AG55x
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PRIME B450M-A II Builds (Compare 4,698 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B450M-A II

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples854x
Ryzen 5 5600GAMD  $119Bench 86%, 14,368 samples625x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples560x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples383x
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples359x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples247x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples133x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD  $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples108x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples91x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples245x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples195x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples163x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback