Asrock B660M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 124%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B660M Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 01:28
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700-$376
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Memory 83.3
1-Core 224
2-Core 443
129% 250 Pts
4-Core 882
8-Core 1,704
153% 1,293 Pts
64-Core 3,464
214% 3,464 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 124%
Great: 130%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
Gigabyte(1458 4106) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 532.03
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 209
Reflection 196
Parallax 212
170% 206 fps
MRender 278
Gravity 170
Splatting 126
149% 192 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 151%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PCH-RVRP-512 512GB
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0709A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1470 1481 1498 1442 1440 1436 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
270% Outstanding
Read 1,725
Write 1,419
Mixed 1,043
SusWrite 1,461
317% 1,412 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 243
4K Mixed 27.9
234% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 884
DQ Write 1,147
DQ Mixed 529
535% 853 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 270%
Great: 278%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 30.5
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 32.9
SC Mixed 22.9
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 25.1" 1280 720 LEN66AA Y25-25
Typical B660M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock B660M Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $388
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback