Dell Inspiron 3030S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell Inspiron 3030S  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0F284Y
Memory5 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240131
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 19:31
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700-$376
U3E1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 71.8
1-Core 207
2-Core 360
112% 213 Pts
4-Core 688
8-Core 1,144
112% 916 Pts
64-Core 2,243
139% 2,243 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 100%
Great: 130%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Dell(1028 0C75) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
8.85% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 11.4
8% 12.2 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 13
Splatting 11.1
10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.85%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme 2400A Micron 1024GB
834GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 24000103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,672
Write 2,059
Mixed 1,535
393% 1,755 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 35.5
211% 85 MB/s
DQ Read 1,355
DQ Write 984
DQ Mixed 1,074
828% 1,138 MB/s
Poor: 226% Great: 317%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M323R2GA3DB0-CWMOD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.2% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 25.2
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 21.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM598A 27EA63
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback