Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive347% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4  (all builds)
Memory58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220808
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 19 '24 at 05:10
Run Duration336 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$215
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 52.2
1-Core 204
2-Core 412
110% 223 Pts
4-Core 807
8-Core 1,567
141% 1187 Pts
64-Core 2,349
145% 2,349 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 102%
Great: 123%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4577
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
6.53% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 14
Parallax 9.2
7% 10.5 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 0
6% 8.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.53%
Great: 9%
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 49%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1301 926 961 773 825 564 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
347% Outstanding
Read 2,201
Write 2,023
Mixed 1,953
SusWrite 892
396% 1,767 MB/s
4K Read 78.4
4K Write 232
4K Mixed 121
397% 144 MB/s
DQ Read 2,025
DQ Write 1,595
DQ Mixed 1,781
1,341% 1,801 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 347%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
315GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 462 471 487 460 462 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 441
Mixed 411
SusWrite 469
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 52.8
185% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 335
252% 337 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155
2TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2765 2762 2764 2763 2767 2765 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
456% Outstanding
Read 2,274
Write 2,774
Mixed 2,544
SusWrite 2,764
586% 2,589 MB/s
4K Read 59.1
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 114
352% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 2,120
DQ Write 1,731
DQ Mixed 1,909
1,434% 1,920 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 456%
Great: 526%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 169 175 172 174 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 118
Write 123
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 172
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 90%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
393GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 40 40 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 52.9
Write 35.5
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 39.2
51% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
72% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 18.8
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 13.6
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 58 60 23.8" 1280 720 HPN3499 HP VH240a
Typical GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4 Builds (Compare 4,969 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,201
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback