Lenovo 10FVS0KX01

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
30 days ago, 29 days ago.
SystemLenovo 10FVS0KX01  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 30BE
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 19:07
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 204
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 601
62% 498 Pts
64-Core 602
37% 602 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Sapphire(1DA2 E426) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.2% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 198
Parallax 199
98% 172 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 138
Splatting 92.6
92% 115 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDSR250GB 250GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 257 84 77 91 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 476
Write 340
Mixed 311
SusWrite 155
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 18.8
97% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 27.9
71% 144 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 90%
Intel SSDSC2KF256G8 SATA 256GB
235GB free
Firmware: LHFD03N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 261 261 262 260 262 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 379
Mixed 387
SusWrite 270
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 53.4
174% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 221
189% 278 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 0420 DDR4 2400 2OZ 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.9% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 20.1
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 20.6
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 55 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7210 SAMSUNG
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback