Asrock B450 Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 146%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics178% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B450 Steel Legend  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190911
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 11:24
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 76.3
1-Core 135
2-Core 265
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 761
77% 624 Pts
64-Core 1,011
63% 1,011 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
178% Outstanding
Lighting 253
Reflection 222
Parallax 248
206% 241 fps
MRender 292
Gravity 225
Splatting 164
179% 227 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 178%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-GEN07SM20M&A256ITNVME 256GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0214B0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 148 170 76 114 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
110% Outstanding
Read 1,400
Write 377
Mixed 127
SusWrite 178
112% 520 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 12.6
114% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 345
227% 276 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 110%
Great: 156%
Colorful CN500 240GB
98GB free
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 410 417 77 75 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 456
Write 395
Mixed 364
SusWrite 243
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 27.7
142% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 38.8
96% 198 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 100%
Apacer AS340 240GB
56GB free
Firmware: R0412A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 39 44 38 45 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 507
Write 456
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 63.5
58% 265 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 32.7
126% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 5.4
DQ Mixed 38.9
38% 66.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 95%
Klevv NEO N610 SSD 512GB
63GB free
Firmware: R0427D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 460 466 403 457 463 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 470
Mixed 442
SusWrite 451
105% 468 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 50.9
172% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 393
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 298
245% 351 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 118%
Great: 124%
V-gen05sm23ar1024int 1TB 1TB
563GB free
Firmware: W0413A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 324 333 341 327 334 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 371
Write 332
Mixed 339
SusWrite 331
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 29.8
130% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 45.9
80% 157 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.9% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 29.5
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 28.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 55: 0P 5R 7G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
55% 38% 55 216 58 165 31.5" 2048 1089 LEN66F2 G32qc-30
Typical B450 Steel Legend Builds (Compare 4,485 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B450 Steel Legend

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback