Asrock B450M/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B450M/ac  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime2 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 19:24
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 84.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 236
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 707
70% 570 Pts
64-Core 901
56% 901 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Lighting 94.1
Reflection 89.6
Parallax 79.1
77% 87.6 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 81.4
Splatting 73.9
61% 74 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU720 500GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N200409a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 51 6.6 5.9 4.2 4.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 446
Write 53.2
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 21.4
33% 153 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 31.9
125% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 50.6
DQ Mixed 77.3
66% 99.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 111%
WD easystore 2647 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 97 97 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 75.1
Write 91.9
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 96
113% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 0.8
326% 3.4 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 10.5
DQ Mixed 0.6
379% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 33.5
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 38.8
SC Mixed 29
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M/ac Builds (Compare 1,947 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock B450M/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback