MSI B560M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7D18)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 156%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 days ago, 10 days ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D18
MotherboardMSI B560M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7D18)  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 09:27
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 162
2-Core 320
104% 192 Pts
4-Core 581
8-Core 1,009
96% 795 Pts
64-Core 1,217
75% 1,217 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
EVGA(3842 4755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3910 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Lighting 228
Reflection 213
Parallax 202
186% 214 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 159
Splatting 142
136% 170 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 155%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR046
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 439 439 411 451 442 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 380
Write 456
Mixed 380
SusWrite 437
94% 413 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 49.2
159% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 152
167% 282 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 107%
Great: 125%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$65
1GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 487
Write 341
Mixed 361
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 52.8
182% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 216
198% 303 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
15GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 116 148 150 131 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 89.2
Write 131
Mixed 68.4
SusWrite 136
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
86GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 170 157 159 125 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 135
Write 152
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 145
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
87% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 106%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
6GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 72 76 68 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 86.4
Write 90.7
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 69.4
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 45.5
MC Write 43.3
MC Mixed 38.3
121% 42.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 45
SC Mixed 33.6
99% 34.7 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 27" 1280 720 AUS27C3 ASUS VG27V
Typical B560M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7D18) Builds (Compare 3,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI B560M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7D18)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback