Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive316% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210709
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 09:27
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 81.1
1-Core 139
2-Core 282
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 896
89% 726 Pts
64-Core 924
57% 924 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.9% Above average
Lighting 70.8
Reflection 76
Parallax 69.4
58% 72.1 fps
MRender 63.7
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 59.7
52% 64.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 1TB
685GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1313 1590 1764 1638 1635 1661 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2,152
Write 1946
Mixed 1,897
SusWrite 1,600
427% 1,899 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 76.4
255% 89 MB/s
DQ Read 1,277
DQ Write 1,129
DQ Mixed 1,231
915% 1,212 MB/s
Poor: 254%
This bench: 316%
Great: 469%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB
465GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 404 425 424 428 360 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 473
Write 457
Mixed 438
SusWrite 395
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 46.2
156% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 357
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 121%
Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
931GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 451 458 458 458 461 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 480
Write 459
Mixed 426
SusWrite 457
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 52.8
174% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 360
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 132%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB
32GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 58 61 60 61 60 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FN Kingston ACR26D4U9S8MH-8 CT8G4DFS8266.C8FN CT8G4DFS8266.M8FJ 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.7% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 20.4
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 19.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 31.5" 1280 720 GSM775C LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback