MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 211%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 214%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics213% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 07:32
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$168
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 78.1
1-Core 172
2-Core 344
104% 198 Pts
4-Core 682
8-Core 1,262
116% 972 Pts
64-Core 1,454
90% 1,454 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$580
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
213% Outstanding
Lighting 315
Reflection 301
Parallax 332
257% 316 fps
MRender 356
Gravity 256
Splatting 192
211% 268 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 213%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,548
Write 1,766
Mixed 1,528
431% 1,948 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 76.7
252% 85.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,380
DQ Write 1,119
DQ Mixed 1,202
913% 1,234 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$65
233GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 274 274 273 274 274 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 451
Mixed 406
SusWrite 292
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 46.6
155% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 160
134% 195 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 118%
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$50
110GB free
Firmware: AADA4105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 272 233 202 213 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,591
Write 334
Mixed 1,128
SusWrite 258
182% 828 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 94.7
4K Mixed 57.5
189% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 719
DQ Write 865
DQ Mixed 290
358% 625 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 173%
Great: 193%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$102
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.2% Good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 26.6
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 27.6
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 27" 1280 720 MSI3FA3 MSI MPG27CQ
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,543 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,012
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback