Biostar H61MHV3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics95.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar H61MHV3  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210514
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 01:16
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 91.6
2-Core 153
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 474
49% 394 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.1% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 132
Parallax 120
98% 124 fps
MRender 92.7
Gravity 125
Splatting 111
90% 110 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Emtec X150 240GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMBB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 75 113 47 33 33 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.5% Average
Read 218
Write 174
Mixed 192
SusWrite 83.7
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 25.4
85% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 62.1
DQ Mixed 35.9
30% 42.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 88%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 238GB
144GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 209 199 201 201 196 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.2% Average
Read 218
Write 193
Mixed 191
SusWrite 202
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 19
78% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 28
DQ Write 74.9
DQ Mixed 12.4
21% 38.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 101%
WD WD5000AVCS-6 500GB
258GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 84.2
Write 84
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 42.2
49% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
127% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EL63I1C1624ZV Kingston 9905471-074.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.2% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 11.2
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.2
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 67.3
60% 67.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 0P 3R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 11% 56 215 58 50 32" 1280 720 VES3700 39W_LCD_TV
Typical H61MHV3 Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MHV3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $97
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback