Lenovo 90H10004US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90H10004US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3100
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171012
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 01:15
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 68.5
1-Core 98
2-Core 195
67% 121 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 691
65% 540 Pts
64-Core 1,022
63% 1,022 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Device(1642 1727) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1149 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.45.40.14
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.3
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 31.7
18% 26.9 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 24
20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
711GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 361 309 368 383 391 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 485
Write 452
Mixed 337
SusWrite 365
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 27.3
100% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 250
199% 278 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 117%
WD My Passport 2627 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 36 35 34 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 28
Write 37.6
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 35.1
47% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.6% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 11.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 11.9
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 44: 0P 3R 7G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
44% 45% 40 207 57 120 26.9" 1920 1017 MSI1462 Optix G27C2
Typical 90H10004US Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 90H10004US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback