MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics172% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230703
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 22:40
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 151
2-Core 298
96% 177 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 854
87% 702 Pts
64-Core 966
60% 966 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
Zotac(19DA 2714) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
172% Outstanding
Lighting 270
Reflection 254
Parallax 273
220% 266 fps
MRender 333
Gravity 224
Splatting 0.2
132% 186 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 172%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253512GB 512GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 134 171 115 126 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 452
Write 404
Mixed 358
SusWrite 140
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 0.1
86% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 222
183% 256 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 102%
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63
41GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 59 62 62 64 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 476
Write 455
Mixed 365
SusWrite 93.7
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 37.3
139% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 377
DQ Mixed 180
182% 293 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 91%
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$85
173GB free
Firmware: 711130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2118 813 784 937 929 921 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,070
Write 2,359
Mixed 1,886
SusWrite 1,084
364% 1,600 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 73.6
271% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,197
DQ Write 806
DQ Mixed 1,040
766% 1,014 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 237%
Great: 333%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
39GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,368
Write 1772
Mixed 1,490
416% 1,876 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 75.9
257% 89.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,214
DQ Write 944
DQ Mixed 1,042
790% 1,067 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
477GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 119 117 115 110 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 84.2
Write 111
Mixed 56
SusWrite 115
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.3% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 36.4
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 34.3
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7058 LC32G7xT
Typical MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 16,087 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $672
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback