Asrock A320M-HD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HD  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190709
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 19:08
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 212
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 676
67% 547 Pts
64-Core 832
52% 832 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.5% Good
Lighting 78
Reflection 78.4
Parallax 63.6
64% 73.3 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 69.4
Splatting 64.7
55% 67 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
256gb SSD 256GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11740
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 422 421 425 427 400 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 456
Mixed 425
SusWrite 421
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 36.8
132% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 236
172% 221 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 167%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
931GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 127 127 125 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 118
Write 115
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 126
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 42
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 33
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 28.2
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 103%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 15" 1280 720 AOCA522 LM522
Typical A320M-HD Builds (Compare 731 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback