CCL Customised AMD Zen Bundles Motherboard Bundle

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCCL Customised AMD Zen Bundles Motherboard Bundle  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte A320M-S2H-CF
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201103
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 02:11
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$73
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 217
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 377
50% 377 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.3.1
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 21
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 27.9
17% 24.9 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 24
19% 22.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
48GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 229 235 223 224 182 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 468
Write 413
Mixed 260
SusWrite 224
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 35.5
120% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 260
203% 285 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83%
Great: 105%
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1560 1652 1682 1403 1068 1317 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,824
Write 1,130
Mixed 1,713
SusWrite 1,447
343% 1,529 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 49.5
164% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 896
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 262
262% 443 MB/s
Poor: 261%
This bench: 236%
Great: 564%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
40GB free
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 89 89 90 88 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 274
Write 124
Mixed 172
SusWrite 90.8
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 28.9
99% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 61.6
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 80.6
64% 87.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 73%
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GB
55GB free
Firmware: 1L2QEXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 269 272 271 237 269 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 344
Write 273
Mixed 295
SusWrite 263
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 41.9
141% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 338
239% 308 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 247%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
594GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 163 168 156 154 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 140
Write 188
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 155
94% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.M8FD CT8G4DFS824A.M8FB 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.5% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 26.1
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 21.7
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 32" 1280 720 WAM2800 284KMB-HDR
Typical Customised AMD Zen Bundles Motherboard Bundle Builds (Compare 211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

System: CCL Customised AMD Zen Bundles Motherboard Bundle

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback