Lenovo F0EL00A5LD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
30 days ago, 8 days ago.
SystemLenovo F0EL00A5LD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3702
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 23:15
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 195
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 528
57% 453 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Legend(17AA 3702) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1371
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
4.05% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 6.6
5% 6.63 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.2
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.05%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
686GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LFM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 18 47 43 15 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 73.6
Write 74.9
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 30.2
43% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
72% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.3% Good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 20.8
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 20.8
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 7 60 23.8" 1920 1009 LEN0540 LEN-A540-B
Typical F0EL00A5LD Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo F0EL00A5LD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback