Today's hottest deals

HP All-in-One 24-f0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP All-in-One 24-f0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8446
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210813
Uptime3 Days
Run DateDec 24 '21 at 05:26
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 80.2
1-Core 53.2
2-Core 106
51% 79.9 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 321
33% 264 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 8446) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 9
Parallax 7.3
5% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0C-00AJM0 480GB
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 231800WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 644 235 231 239 239 232 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 1,312
Write 1,671
Mixed 1,214
SusWrite 303
253% 1,125 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 49.6
164% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 663
DQ Write 426
DQ Mixed 544
406% 544 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 146%
Great: 226%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$23
786GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 194 194 199 197 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 160
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 196
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
69.1% Good
MC Read 27
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 25.2
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical All-in-One 24-f0xx Builds (Compare 527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP All-in-One 24-f0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback