Asus PRIME A620M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics256% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A620M-E  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 17:28
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 79.1
1-Core 189
2-Core 374
112% 214 Pts
4-Core 753
8-Core 1,098
116% 926 Pts
64-Core 1,340
83% 1,340 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-TS (Ti-Super)-$780
Nvidia(10DE 18CE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
256% Outstanding
Lighting 380
Reflection 366
Parallax 382
310% 376 fps
MRender 479
Gravity 298
Splatting 232
263% 336 fps
Poor: 233%
This bench: 256%
Great: 265%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 850 Lite 1TB
844GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1002B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,282
Write 3,585
Mixed 2,025
591% 2,631 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 248
4K Mixed 34.9
264% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,859
DQ Write 1476
DQ Mixed 1,162
1,007% 1,499 MB/s
Poor: 179% Great: 482%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U5600C3616G-CLARB 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
147% Outstanding
MC Read 53.2
MC Write 53.4
MC Mixed 52.6
152% 53.1 GB/s
SC Read 47.4
SC Write 52.2
SC Mixed 49.7
142% 49.8 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 147%
This bench: 147%
Great: 188%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 21.1" 1280 720 HKC2000 CASPER
Typical PRIME A620M-E Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A620M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback