Mm-vision Computer

Performance Results

Gaming 216%
Desktop 100%
Workstation 233%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics233% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMm-vision Computer  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.5 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200721
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 11 '24 at 22:41
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 97.5
1-Core 151
2-Core 266
97% 172 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 913
85% 706 Pts
64-Core 1,996
124% 1,996 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-TS (Ti-Super)-$791
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
233% Outstanding
Lighting 378
Reflection 530
Parallax 440
308% 449 fps
MRender 475
Gravity 292
Splatting 0.3
181% 256 fps
Poor: 233%
This bench: 233%
Great: 265%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 749 99 209 106 103 31 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,522
Write 1,509
Mixed 1,069
SusWrite 216
241% 1,079 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 67
225% 78.6 MB/s
DQ Read 638
DQ Write 788
DQ Mixed 468
421% 631 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 176%
Great: 258%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMN32GX4M2Z4600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4533 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 45.2
MC Mixed 31.1
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 51
SC Mixed 33
101% 35.2 GB/s
Latency 47.2
85% 47.2 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 109%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 51 165 27" 1280 720 HPN3673 OMEN 27i IPS
Typical Computer Builds (Compare 1,690 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 76%
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 63%

System: Mm-vision Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $426
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback