Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NV_FA507NV

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 95% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

13 days ago, 13 days ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NV_FA507NV (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FA507NV
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230811
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 15 '24 at 11:28
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS 3,338 User benchmarks, average bench 79% FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 73.8 1-Core 124 2-Core 170 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 683 64% 533 Pts	64-Core 1,197 74% 1,197 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop) 18,525 User benchmarks, average bench 113% Asus(1043 19DD) ≥ 4GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.40.50 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	123% Outstanding	Lighting 169 Reflection 208 Parallax 142 138% 173 fps	MRender 217 Gravity 118 Splatting 96.2 112% 144 fps
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 129%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB 5,198 User benchmarks, average bench 192% 262GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3MA003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1430 1510 1491 324 81 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	163% Outstanding	Read 1,344 Write 1472 Mixed 1,145 SusWrite 819 269% 1,195 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 72.9 4K Mixed 28.9 138% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 671 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 595 393% 481 MB/s
Poor: 124% ↑ This bench: 163% Great: 252%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 2,304 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 345GB free, PID 0210 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 80 81 78 82 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 83.4 Write 86.9 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 79.3 94% 70.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB 26,893 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	115% Outstanding	MC Read 40.6 MC Write 48 MC Mixed 38.7 121% 42.4 GB/s	SC Read 24.9 SC Write 47.7 SC Mixed 29 97% 33.9 GB/s	Latency 91.1 44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	48	12	144	15.5"	1280 720	AUOD2A2 B156HAN15.H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NV_FA507NV Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NV_FA507NV

CPU
Ryzen 7 7735HSAMDBench 79%, 3,338 samples	67x
Ryzen 5 7535HS GraphicsAMDBench 80%, 1,150 samples	8x
Ryzen 7 7735HAMDBench 85%, 59 samples	2x

GPU
RTX 4060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 113%, 18,525 samples	41x
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 27%, 25,679 samples	36x

SSD
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GBBench 192%, 5,198 samples	46x
PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1002 1TBWDBench 364%, 853 samples	10x
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA1T0QFM 1TBBench 256%, 2,000 samples	5x

RAM
M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GBSamsungBench 120%, 26,893 samples	16x
MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 2x8GBMicronBench 120%, 12,360 samples	15x
HMCG66MEBSA095N 2x8GBHynixBench 122%, 2,593 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16