Turbo-x GK400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemTurbo-x GK400  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI H110MPROVH
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 23:03
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 201
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 396
52% 393 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
MSI(1462 8D9D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3525 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.3% Very good
Lighting 99.8
Reflection 85.6
Parallax 90.8
81% 92.1 fps
MRender 82.5
Gravity 75.9
Splatting 67.4
61% 75.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0630A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 432
Write 267
Mixed 140
61% 280 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 20.9
93% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 14.1
39% 84 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 81%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
334GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 497
Write 465
Mixed 445
105% 469 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 51.1
168% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 350
264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
445GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 157
Write 125
Mixed 31.5
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
70.6% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 21.4
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 21.6
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 75 24.5" 1280 720 AOC2590 2590G5
Typical GK400 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Turbo-x GK400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $129
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback