Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181204
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 15:28
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 86.9
1-Core 136
2-Core 272
91% 165 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 809
83% 670 Pts
64-Core 875
54% 875 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 157
Reflection 160
Parallax 162
128% 159 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 135
Splatting 118
114% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 119%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 522 433 432 430 427 424 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1039
Write 1,487
Mixed 944
SusWrite 445
221% 979 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 45.3
135% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 712
DQ Write 634
DQ Mixed 588
464% 645 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 141%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
593GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1605 1359 1278 1253 1219 1250 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 1,844
Write 1,715
Mixed 1,411
SusWrite 1,327
354% 1,574 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 54.5
177% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,130
DQ Write 864
DQ Mixed 980
737% 991 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 254%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 20.8
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 19.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 41: 0P 4R 4G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
41% 61% 28 185 11 144 27" 2560 1369 ACI27EC ROG PG279Q
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,623 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $380

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $1,338
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback