Asrock A520M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 208%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive323% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A520M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240118
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 12:12
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$176
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 172
2-Core 346
109% 204 Pts
4-Core 673
8-Core 1,252
115% 963 Pts
64-Core 1,520
94% 1,520 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
Zotac(19DA 2696) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
194% Outstanding
Lighting 275
Reflection 259
Parallax 276
224% 270 fps
MRender 352
Gravity 236
Splatting 187
203% 258 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 194%
Great: 205%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
686GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2056 2064 2091 2109 2121 2126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 1,712
Write 1,388
Mixed 1,831
SusWrite 2,094
397% 1,757 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 70.7
229% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,389
DQ Write 1,081
DQ Mixed 1,216
915% 1,229 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 323%
Great: 365%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C15 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.1
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 31.2
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 40.5
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 56: 0P 5R 10G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
56% 67% 24 213 56 240 31.5" 1920 1009 AOC3202 32G2WG8
Typical A520M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 337 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 138% - Outstanding Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback