Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605ZV_K3605ZV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics81.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605ZV_K3605ZV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K3605ZV
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 02:48
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12650H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 71.3
1-Core 184
2-Core 358
106% 205 Pts
4-Core 653
8-Core 1018
103% 836 Pts
64-Core 1,422
88% 1,422 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 19C3) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5222
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.9% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 122
Parallax 97.8
83% 107 fps
MRender 148
Gravity 79
Splatting 78.1
80% 102 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,387
Write 1,469
Mixed 1180
300% 1,345 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 35.4
199% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 934
DQ Write 431
DQ Mixed 661
496% 675 MB/s
Poor: 107% Great: 234%
Usb3.0 Super Speed 1TB
104GB free
Firmware: 0214
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 140
Write 141
Mixed 36.6
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 72%
TOSHIBA MK1637GSX 160GB
97GB free, PID 0c15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 51.9
Write 28.9
Mixed 22.8
39% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
34% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 17%
SDXC Card 64GB
57GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 26.6
Write 13.7
Mixed 19.6
24% 20 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.7
231% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G44BM0-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 17.3
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 15.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 65: 0P 5R 10G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
65% 27% 94 170 3 120 16" 1280 720 BOE0B2B
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605ZV_K3605ZV Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605ZV_K3605ZV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback