MSI MS-16R6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 11UC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R6  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220921
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 01:23
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 63.3
1-Core 142
2-Core 281
85% 162 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 710
76% 606 Pts
64-Core 870
54% 870 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 132E) 128MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
4.86% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 10
Parallax 5.8
4% 7 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 7.1
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.86%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00BTW 512GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,084
Write 2,045
Mixed 1,643
429% 1,924 MB/s
4K Read 71.7
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 90.7
308% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,128
DQ Write 820
DQ Mixed 965
724% 971 MB/s
Poor: 125% Great: 332%
Jmicron Generic 500GB
220GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 18 19 19 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 102
Write 17.9
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 18.6
29% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
86% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 29.6
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 17.9
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUOD0A2
Typical MS-16R6 Builds (Compare 4,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback