Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 181%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 179%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF  (all builds)
Memory18.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231221
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 01:34
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$415
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 142
2-Core 274
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 995
94% 780 Pts
64-Core 1,460
90% 1,460 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
190% Outstanding
Lighting 279
Reflection 254
Parallax 278
227% 270 fps
MRender 311
Gravity 215
Splatting 172
183% 233 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 190%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,527
Write 2,315
Mixed 1479
468% 2,107 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 79.9
267% 93.1 MB/s
DQ Read 995
DQ Write 793
DQ Mixed 877
661% 888 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
67GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 460 459 452 458 459 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 450
Mixed 431
SusWrite 454
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 51
164% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 294
240% 340 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 116%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$40
209GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 141 144 142 136 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 159
Write 164
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 140
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.4% Very good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 21.7
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 22.6
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 200 29.5" 1280 720 MSI3CB4 MSI MAG301CR2
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 6,855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $892
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback