MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
24 days ago, 24 days ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B51
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201231
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 13:37
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 69.5
1-Core 135
2-Core 265
84% 156 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 851
84% 687 Pts
64-Core 932
58% 932 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3550 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.8% Excellent
Lighting 93
Reflection 105
Parallax 0.3
76% 66 fps
MRender 157
Gravity 121
Splatting 98.4
100% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 29 17 3 23 1.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 323
Write 257
Mixed 241
SusWrite 41
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 12.6
43% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 52.7
DQ Mixed 43.7
43% 70.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 55%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
263GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 318 380 402 332 351 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 366
Write 388
Mixed 316
SusWrite 352
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 29.2
94% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 354
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 166 192 193 184 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 138
Write 145
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 174
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
415% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 90%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 130 127 127 127 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 90.4
Write 107
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 127
73% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
161% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 65%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
532GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 81 82 81 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 50.4
Write 54.9
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 80.8
74% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 12.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 11.9
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 699 26 144 31.5" 1280 720 AOC3220 AG322QWS4R4
Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) Builds (Compare 23,017 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $855
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback