Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
25 days ago, 21 days ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P  (all builds)
Memory16 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 09:53
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 63.1
1-Core 160
2-Core 319
94% 181 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 859
88% 711 Pts
64-Core 986
61% 986 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Gigabyte(1458 4073) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.6% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 146
Parallax 118
104% 131 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 95.7
Splatting 83.2
82% 103 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 786 580 491 491 484 509 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 916
Write 831
Mixed 1,245
SusWrite 557
200% 887 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 27.8
106% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 981
DQ Write 700
DQ Mixed 844
630% 842 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 140%
Great: 297%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$66
240GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 319 311 317 324 365 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 399
Write 265
Mixed 369
SusWrite 323
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 27.3
82% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 371
278% 370 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78%
Great: 130%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
75GB free
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 213 210 195 196 197 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 547
Write 606
Mixed 285
SusWrite 210
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 17.9
72% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 640
DQ Write 500
DQ Mixed 318
306% 486 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 144%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 179 180 175 178 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 163
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 177
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX DDR4 3000 2OZ 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.8% Above average
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 23.5
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 16.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 13 240 24.5" 2048 1089 TRG101E LQ25F240L
Typical GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P Builds (Compare 2,315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback