Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506HC
Memory16.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 01:17
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 66.6
1-Core 143
2-Core 285
87% 165 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 843
86% 698 Pts
64-Core 1,055
65% 1,055 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 13FC) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5123
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.2% Above average
Lighting 79.9
Reflection 103
Parallax 64.6
65% 82.5 fps
MRender 74.2
Gravity 64.8
Splatting 0.2
33% 46.4 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 30 20 19 282 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 2065
Write 1,374
Mixed 1,125
SusWrite 122
259% 1,172 MB/s
4K Read 67.3
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 74.1
250% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 452
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 413
297% 386 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 185%
Great: 297%
Nvme XF-1TB 2280 1TB
303GB free
Firmware: SN13124 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1419 1442 1468 1478 1479 1455 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
241% Outstanding
Read 1,869
Write 1,458
Mixed 1,443
SusWrite 1,457
350% 1,556 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 48.3
166% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 864
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 587
429% 577 MB/s
Poor: 241%
This bench: 241%
Great: 383%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 15.1
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 14.3
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 47: 0P 4R 9G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 50% 14 216 57 144 15.5" 1536 841 BOE090F
History: Score 19: 0P 2R 2G 3B | Score 47: 0P 4R 9G 0B
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC Builds (Compare 4,112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback