Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics59.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 15:57
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$166
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 76.8
1-Core 171
2-Core 342
103% 197 Pts
4-Core 676
8-Core 1076
108% 876 Pts
64-Core 1,417
88% 1,417 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
MSI(1462 3177) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.1% Above average
Lighting 74.4
Reflection 83.8
Parallax 74
61% 77.4 fps
MRender 75.2
Gravity 67.7
Splatting 65
56% 69.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 114 120 118 117 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 370
Write 145
Mixed 192
SusWrite 118
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 24.8
88% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 127
102% 145 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 83%
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
875GB free
Firmware: P9CR411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1425 1431 1440 1442 1418 1397 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 1,334
Write 1,444
Mixed 1,387
SusWrite 1,425
316% 1,397 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 76.2
244% 81.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,226
DQ Write 922
DQ Mixed 1057
795% 1,068 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 264%
Great: 441%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
157GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 65 65 64 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 83.3
Write 72
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 64.9
51% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
410GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 109 110 108 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 101
Write 108
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 109
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%
TOSHIBA MQ04ABF100 1TB
217GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 77 78 78 77 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 128
Write 128
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 78.9
112% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
39% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M4A2400C14 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.2% Good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 26.2
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 25.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 0.7" 1280 720 OEM3700 32W_LCD_TV
Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $620
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback