Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 276%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 268%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics268% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 15:24
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$305
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 97.3
1-Core 160
2-Core 293
102% 184 Pts
4-Core 620
8-Core 1,098
104% 860 Pts
64-Core 1,423
88% 1,423 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 107%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
Nvidia(10DE 1795) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
268% Outstanding
Lighting 390
Reflection 599
Parallax 451
318% 480 fps
MRender 519
Gravity 352
Splatting 255
293% 375 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 268%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
307GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1001 874 874 871 854 840 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2541
Write 2,367
Mixed 1834
SusWrite 886
427% 1907 MB/s
4K Read 59.8
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 77.3
249% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 983
DQ Write 859
DQ Mixed 876
669% 906 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 275%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
524GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1034 1046 1044 1043 1039 1041 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,352
Write 1,070
Mixed 1,107
SusWrite 1,041
257% 1,143 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 74
236% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1016
DQ Write 851
DQ Mixed 915
690% 927 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 233%
Great: 372%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 487 487 486 487 488 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 486
Mixed 438
SusWrite 487
108% 481 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 50.3
165% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 367
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 118%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 189 188 189 184 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 146
Mixed 74
SusWrite 186
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
7TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 172 175 172 175 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 114
Write 173
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 174
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX4M2Z3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 57
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 45.2
123% 43.1 GB/s
SC Read 33.8
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 42.6
98% 34.4 GB/s
Latency 40.7
98% 40.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 121%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7236 Odyssey G65B
Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback