Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 282%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 275%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics266% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '24 at 19:16
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$307
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 98.8
1-Core 164
2-Core 328
107% 197 Pts
4-Core 642
8-Core 1,183
109% 912 Pts
64-Core 1,432
89% 1,432 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$1,000
Nvidia(10DE 1795) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
266% Outstanding
Lighting 430
Reflection 558
Parallax 396
351% 461 fps
MRender 363
Gravity 257
Splatting 224
223% 281 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 266%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
316GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1109 873 866 851 848 835 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 2,558
Write 2,366
Mixed 1,843
SusWrite 897
429% 1,916 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 78.6
255% 85.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,373
DQ Write 1,125
DQ Mixed 1,197
911% 1,232 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 292%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
101GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1027 1040 1041 1036 1003 955 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 1,355
Write 1068
Mixed 1,107
SusWrite 1,017
255% 1,137 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 75.6
242% 80.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,415
DQ Write 1,145
DQ Mixed 1,254
946% 1,271 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 249%
Great: 372%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$145
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 489 489 488 485 487 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 489
Mixed 456
SusWrite 487
110% 486 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 49.8
165% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 370
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 118%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 178 180 180 179 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 142
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 180
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 100%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 181 185 185 184 181 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX4M2Z3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 58.1
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 45.4
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 33.3
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 43.1
98% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 47.3
85% 47.3 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 121%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 10 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7236 Odyssey G65B
Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $800
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $125Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback