MSI MEG X670E GODLIKE (MS-7D68)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 527%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 124%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics350% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive479% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D68
MotherboardMSI MEG X670E GODLIKE (MS-7D68)  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 07:33
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$450
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Memory 98.5
1-Core 202
2-Core 402
124% 234 Pts
4-Core 797
8-Core 1,582
140% 1,190 Pts
64-Core 3,737
231% 3,737 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 124%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,650
Nvidia(10DE 16F4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3420 MHz, MLim: 6060 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
350% Outstanding
Lighting 535
Reflection 579
Parallax 746
436% 620 fps
MRender 496
Gravity 587
Splatting 308
364% 464 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 350%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 4TB-$299
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3955 3880 3973 3867 3978 3940 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
479% Outstanding
Read 1915
Write 4,296
Mixed 3,276
SusWrite 3,932
766% 3,355 MB/s
4K Read 65.3
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 89.7
288% 98.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,818
DQ Write 1,460
DQ Mixed 1,622
1,219% 1,633 MB/s
Poor: 306%
This bench: 479%
Great: 619%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
144% Outstanding
MC Read 78.3
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 41.7
150% 52.5 GB/s
SC Read 42.8
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 40.5
116% 40.5 GB/s
Latency 43.8
91% 43.8 ns
Poor: 145%
This bench: 144%
Great: 193%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 72: 0P 5R 9G 20B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
72% 58% 59 217 57 540 24.3" 1280 720 AUS24B5 ROG PG248QP
Typical MEG X670E GODLIKE (MS-7D68) Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X670E GODLIKE (MS-7D68)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $2,260
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback