MSI MEG X670E GODLIKE (MS-7D68)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 497%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 634%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 124%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics424% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive513% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D68
MotherboardMSI MEG X670E GODLIKE (MS-7D68)  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 06:30
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$450
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Memory 97.7
1-Core 201
2-Core 401
124% 233 Pts
4-Core 798
8-Core 1,578
140% 1,188 Pts
64-Core 3,719
230% 3,719 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 124%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,650
Nvidia(10DE 16F4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3420 MHz, MLim: 6060 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
424% Outstanding
Lighting 693
Reflection 614
Parallax 819
564% 709 fps
MRender 530
Gravity 641
Splatting 310
386% 493 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 424%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 4TB-$299
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4169 4167 4169 4188 4186 4245 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
513% Outstanding
Read 2,213
Write 4,561
Mixed 3,481
SusWrite 4,187
824% 3,611 MB/s
4K Read 70.4
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 98
316% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,791
DQ Write 1,389
DQ Mixed 1596
1,192% 1,592 MB/s
Poor: 306%
This bench: 513%
Great: 619%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
125% Outstanding
MC Read 57.6
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 39.7
126% 44.2 GB/s
SC Read 41.7
SC Write 37.9
SC Mixed 43.8
118% 41.1 GB/s
Latency 54.6
73% 54.6 ns
Poor: 145%
This bench: 125%
Great: 193%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 31: 0P 0R 1G 28B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 42% 69 455 308 60 24.1" 1280 720 AUS24B5 ROG PG248QP
Typical MEG X670E GODLIKE (MS-7D68) Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X670E GODLIKE (MS-7D68)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $2,260
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback