Asus ROG STRIX Z790-E GAMING WIFI II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 507%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 131%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 671%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 136%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics392% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive468% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z790-E GAMING WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory42.4 GB free of 48 GB
Display2560x1440x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 07:04
Run Duration382 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900K-$490
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 243
2-Core 478
141% 272 Pts
4-Core 952
8-Core 1,885
168% 1,419 Pts
64-Core 4,394
272% 4,394 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 136%
Great: 137%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,650
Zotac(19DA 4675) ≥ 4GB; Zotac(19DA 4675) ≥ 4GB ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 4090 AMP Extreme AIRO
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
392% Outstanding
Lighting 630
Reflection 579
Parallax 783
513% 664 fps
MRender 536
Gravity 570
Splatting 302
367% 469 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 392%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac NVMe SSD 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: H230407a Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4071 3946 2377 739 759 766 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
468% Outstanding
Read 3,908
Write 4,107
Mixed 2,917
SusWrite 2,110
732% 3,261 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 248
4K Mixed 111
358% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,841
DQ Write 1,336
DQ Mixed 1,587
1,186% 1,588 MB/s
Poor: 186%
This bench: 468%
Great: 606%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
534GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3004 2876 2877 2774 1444 1450 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
434% Outstanding
Read 2,384
Write 2,901
Mixed 2,706
SusWrite 2,404
588% 2,599 MB/s
4K Read 70.7
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 115
369% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1940
DQ Write 1,507
DQ Mixed 1,731
1,293% 1,726 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 434%
Great: 488%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
707GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2131 2115 2107 2118 662 312 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 1,508
Write 1,981
Mixed 1642
SusWrite 1,574
380% 1,676 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 216
4K Mixed 91.5
303% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,877
DQ Write 1,418
DQ Mixed 1,595
1,207% 1,630 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 324%
Great: 365%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
553GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 474 474 475 461 459 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 452
Mixed 440
SusWrite 470
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 49.1
158% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 340
256% 344 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
619GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 457 457 461 464 464 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 456
Mixed 451
SusWrite 460
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 49.1
159% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 339
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 160 160 160 157 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 151
Write 163
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 159
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
140% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-8000J4048F242x24GB
2 of 4 slots used
48GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6800 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
239% Outstanding
MC Read 96.6
MC Write 97.3
MC Mixed 91.4
272% 95.1 GB/s
SC Read 28.4
SC Write 55.8
SC Mixed 40
118% 41.4 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 157%
This bench: 239%
Great: 275%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 31.5" 1280 720 ACR060A Z321QU
Typical ROG STRIX Z790-E GAMING WIFI II Builds (Compare 423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 460%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 611%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z790-E GAMING WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $2,309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback