Monster TULPAR T5 V23.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster TULPAR T5 V23.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T5 V23.2
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230802
Uptime22 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 22:32
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12650H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 69.2
1-Core 128
2-Core 262
82% 153 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 912
87% 719 Pts
64-Core 1,315
81% 1,315 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 A552) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 4.6
3% 4.6 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 3.8
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFKNU010TZ 1TB
772GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1579 1481 1584 1589 1314 1506 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,611
Write 1,059
Mixed 1,087
SusWrite 1509
295% 1,316 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 37.1
152% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 779
DQ Write 1,022
DQ Mixed 790
627% 864 MB/s
Poor: 180%
This bench: 242%
Great: 389%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FR 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 37.4
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 22.7
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 52 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical TULPAR T5 V23.2 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V23.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback