Intel X79M-S

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 70% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Intel X79M-S (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201225
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	May 10 '24 at 16:47
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2660 0 1,318 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 78.7 1-Core 55.6 2-Core 139 55% 91.1 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 454 43% 355 Pts	64-Core 658 41% 658 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Zotac(19DA 1630) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	128% Outstanding	Lighting 180 Reflection 170 Parallax 163 147% 171 fps	MRender 179 Gravity 133 Splatting 114 113% 142 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S500G 500GB 18,653 User benchmarks, average bench 233% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: ELFK0S.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1021 1503 1417 985 480 158 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	151% Outstanding	Read 1,186 Write 1,522 Mixed 1,357 SusWrite 927 282% 1,248 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 42.9 4K Mixed 36.2 117% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 287 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 253 185% 243 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 151% Great: 323%
ASMT 2115 120GB 614 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 62GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 25 26 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 54.5 Write 25.8 Mixed 26.9 SusWrite 25.4 40% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 5 239% 5.67 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 162%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0- M393B1K70CHD- 16GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.2% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 8 24% 8.37 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 6.8 22% 7.67 GB/s	Latency 80.8 50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	3	70	58	60	27"	2560 1440	YEY2700 YMG-4K27-01

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79M-S Builds (Compare 592 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Intel X79M-S

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	124x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	90x
Xeon E5-2630 v2IntelBench 67%, 1,838 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	37x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	35x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	34x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x
128GB 128GBSKBench 102%, 33 samples	14x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	58x
36JSZF51272PZ 4x4GBMicronBench 66%, 485 samples	56x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16