Intel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Intel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds)
Memory	14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170511
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '18 at 12:42
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	JOR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 89.9 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 190 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 691 62% 524 Pts	64-Core 891 55% 891 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% PwrHis(1787 2012) 2GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.5.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	7.26% Terrible	Lighting 8.7 Reflection 10.7 Parallax 10.6 7% 10 fps	MRender 9.62 Gravity 7.33 Splatting 10.4 8% 9.11 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.26% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 245 262 283 283 283 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Read 355 Write 325 Mixed 311 SusWrite 256 70% 312 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 46.8 4K Mixed 33.4 109% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 215 163% 221 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 124%
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 20GB free Firmware: CS900612 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 96 79 51 52 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 348 Write 259 Mixed 261 SusWrite 82.6 53% 238 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 44.7 4K Mixed 22.2 88% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 195 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 135 117% 173 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 487GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 86 91 92 92 91 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 94.8 Write 96.8 Mixed 81.3 SusWrite 90 67% 90.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 115% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 67%
WD WD1600AABS-00PRA0 160GB 8,028 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 84GB free Firmware: 05.06H05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 62 64 63 63 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 61.6 Write 60.9 Mixed 38.6 SusWrite 62.8 41% 56 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0- M393B1K70CHD- 16GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	49.7% Average	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 12.1 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 67.3 59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

CPU
Xeon E5-2665 0IntelBench 67%, 1,061 samples	2x
Xeon E5-2660 0IntelBench 63%, 1,318 samples	1x
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 8500 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 4,580 samples	1x
GTX 660-TiNvidia $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples	1x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	1x
M667 120G 120GBShinediskBench 56%, 237 samples	1x
SSDPR-CX400-256 256GBBench 72%, 3,217 samples	1x

RAM
1x8GBDimm6_ManufacturerBench 25%, 7 samples	2x
HMT151R7TFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 66%, 190 samples	1x
36JSZF51272PZ 4x4GBMicronBench 66%, 485 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 10% - Terrible

Total price: $89

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369