Intel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170511
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateDec 18 '18 at 15:27
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 77
2-Core 146
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 586
56% 464 Pts
64-Core 832
52% 832 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
PwrHis(1787 2012) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.17% Terrible
Lighting 7.43
Reflection 9.08
Parallax 9.12
6% 8.55 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 6.33
Splatting 8.7
6% 7.71 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.17%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 172 160 153 157 158 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 318
Write 280
Mixed 283
SusWrite 162
59% 261 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 24
78% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 220
167% 226 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 124%
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
88GB free
Firmware: SBFMBA.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 165 169 177 174 175 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.4% Poor
Read 142
Write 99
Mixed 82
SusWrite 171
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 9.6
38% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 15.5
DQ Write 16.4
DQ Mixed 14.4
11% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 101%
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
22GB free
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 81 57 69 55 56 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.2% Average
Read 236
Write 218
Mixed 201
SusWrite 88.8
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 18.7
70% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 143
122% 179 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 87%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 138 139 135 131 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 142
Write 116
Mixed 20
SusWrite 136
133% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 52%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 141 140 142 146 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 142
Write 141
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 141
145% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0- M393B1K70CHD- 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.6% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.7
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 11
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 10% - Terrible Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback