PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 6.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Intel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds) |
Memory | 12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170511 |
Uptime | 1.4 Days |
Run Date | Dec 18 '18 at 15:27 |
Run Duration | 182 Seconds |
Run User | JOR-User |
Background CPU | 35% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
75.3%
Very good
|
63% 103 Pts
|
56% 464 Pts
|
52% 832 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD R7 240
PwrHis(1787 2012) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.9.3
|
6.17%
Terrible
|
6% 8.55 fps
|
6% 7.71 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 172 160 153 157 158 MB/s
|
57.1%
Above average
|
59% 261 MB/s
|
78% 24.9 MB/s
|
167% 226 MB/s
|
![]() Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
88GB free
Firmware: SBFMBA.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 165 169 177 174 175 MB/s
|
28.4%
Poor
|
28% 124 MB/s
|
38% 12.1 MB/s
|
11% 15.4 MB/s
|
![]() |
45.2%
Average
|
42% 186 MB/s
|
70% 23.5 MB/s
|
122% 179 MB/s
|
![]() TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 138 139 135 131 138 MB/s
|
52.3%
Above average
|
133% 103 MB/s
|
43% 0.83 MB/s
|
|
![]() TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 141 140 142 146 140 MB/s
|
53.2%
Above average
|
145% 111 MB/s
|
39% 0.77 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung M393B1K70CH0- M393B1K70CHD- 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44.6%
Average
|
44% 15.4 GB/s
|
34% 11.9 GB/s
|
57% 70.2 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Xeon E5-2665 0IntelBench 67%, 1,061 samples | 2x |
Xeon E5-2660 0IntelBench 63%, 1,318 samples | 1x |
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 1x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GeForce 8500 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 4,580 samples | 1x |
GTX 660-TiNvidia $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples | 1x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 10% - Terrible | Total price: $89 |