Lenovo 20AQ005TUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20AQ005TUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20AQ005TUS
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140903
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 13:37
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
48% Average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 59.6
2-Core 101
48% 76.7 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 161
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 220C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.36% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2
Parallax 4.5
2% 3 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.36%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 32 32 31 27 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 360
Write 340
Mixed 303
SusWrite 55.7
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 31.4
102% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 228
182% 257 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT851S6AMR6A-PB HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.8% Below average
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.9
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 12.3
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 0P 2R 1G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 15% 60 66 28 60 14" 1280 720 LEN40A1
Typical 20AQ005TUS Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20AQ005TUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback