Asrock X570 Steel Legend WiFi ax

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive376% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Steel Legend WiFi ax  (all builds)
Memory17.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221019
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 22:46
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 80.7
1-Core 168
2-Core 326
102% 191 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1,016
97% 802 Pts
64-Core 1,121
69% 1,121 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
MSI(1462 397B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 123
Parallax 127
109% 128 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 105
Splatting 91.3
90% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Predator GM7000 512GB
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.A.J.CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3361 3747 3248 839 730 653 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
376% Outstanding
Read 2325
Write 3,678
Mixed 2,545
SusWrite 2,096
603% 2,661 MB/s
4K Read 77.8
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 104
350% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1225
DQ Write 857
DQ Mixed 1,036
775% 1,039 MB/s
Poor: 225%
This bench: 376%
Great: 475%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
216GB free
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 140 149 147 144 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 459
Write 372
Mixed 317
SusWrite 173
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 16.6
78% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 30.2
44% 82.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 55%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
489GB free
Firmware: P9CR313
SusWrite @10s intervals: 583 1335 2553 776 398 404 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,211
Write 1,004
Mixed 1,267
SusWrite 1,008
253% 1,123 MB/s
4K Read 66.6
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 96.2
322% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,280
DQ Write 1,010
DQ Mixed 1,126
848% 1,139 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 261%
Great: 394%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
870GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 108 107 106 108 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 187
Write 186
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 108
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 BL8G30C15U4R.M8FE1 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 24GB
3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.1% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 30.1
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 31.6
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 27.6" 1920 1009 SAM701E LC27T55
Typical X570 Steel Legend WiFi ax Builds (Compare 502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Steel Legend WiFi ax

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $783
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback