TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605ZV_K3605ZV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605ZV_K3605ZV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K3605ZV
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230511
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 18:45
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12650H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 72.1
1-Core 161
2-Core 291
93% 175 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 726
76% 610 Pts
64-Core 1018
63% 1018 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑
This bench: 82%
 Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 19C3) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5222
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.9% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 120
Parallax 108
91% 113 fps
MRender 160
Gravity 86.6
Splatting 76
84% 108 fps
Poor: 83% ↑
This bench: 88.9%
 Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,441
Write 1,533
Mixed 1220
312% 1,398 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 38.3
227% 88.6 MB/s
DQ Read 922
DQ Write 487
DQ Mixed 701
522% 704 MB/s
Poor: 107% Great: 234%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G44BM0-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.4
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑
This bench: 52.6%
 Great: 55%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 27 120 16" 1280 720 BOE0B2B
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605ZV_K3605ZV Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605ZV_K3605ZV

CPU
Core i7-12650HIntelBench 96%, 16,339 samples20x
Core i5-12500HIntelBench 94%, 11,588 samples9x
Core i5-12450HIntelBench 89%, 9,550 samples5x
GPU
RTX 4060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 113%, 18,525 samples15x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 11%, 18,986 samples14x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 15%, 7,232 samples4x
SSD
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GBNvmeBench 172%, 2,910 samples27x
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA1T0TFK 1TBNvmeBench 243%, 3,424 samples3x
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA1T0TFK 1TBBench 252%, 10,807 samples2x
RAM
M471A2G44BM0-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 48%, 439 samples31x
M471A2G44BM0-CWE M471A2K43EB1-CWE 32GBSamsungBench 96%, 69 samples3x
M471A2G44BM0-CWE Kingston 9905700-101.A00G 32GBSamsungBench 102%, 5 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback