Asus PRIME B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 06:32
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 129
2-Core 249
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 843
82% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,057
65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.2% Above average
Lighting 63.1
Reflection 59.9
Parallax 85.1
51% 69.4 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 45.7
48% 59.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$103
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,243
Write 1,924
Mixed 1,897
450% 2,021 MB/s
4K Read 63.3
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 82.5
271% 92.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,249
DQ Write 949
DQ Mixed 1,057
802% 1,085 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
27GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 256 258 77 7.2 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 495
Write 430
Mixed 392
SusWrite 114
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 0.5
48% 12.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 92%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
49GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 96 79 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 498
Write 440
Mixed 12.4
SusWrite 151
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 30.7
85% 21.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 92%
Patriot P400L 500GB
59GB free
Firmware: SN11778
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,962
Write 2,792
Mixed 1,980
573% 2,578 MB/s
4K Read 58.7
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 81.4
288% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,510
DQ Write 1186
DQ Mixed 1,325
998% 1,340 MB/s
Poor: 173% Great: 337%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
66GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 88 78 62 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 84.5
Write 87.3
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 77.1
57% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
28GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 56 55 59 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 63.4
Write 70
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 61.5
46% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36%
Great: 57%
Adata HD650 1TB
11GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 99 97 104 118 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 141
Write 150
Mixed 57
SusWrite 106
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.6
227% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 32.9
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 30.1
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 96.5
42% 96.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0P 0R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 20% 10 211 57 144 27" 1280 720 ACR0490 XB271HU
History: Score 4: 0P 0R 1G 1B | Score 10: 0P 0R 2G 4B
Typical PRIME B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,965 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback