HP p6-2440el

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p6-2440el  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ADA
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130205
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 19:28
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 179
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 495
52% 414 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
MSI(1462 2755) 2GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.08
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5
Parallax 4.5
3% 4.4 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 4.4
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 500G 500GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401120RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 165 145 179 140 159 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57% Above average
Read 219
Write 220
Mixed 179
SusWrite 162
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 29.5
95% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 181
140% 191 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 57%
Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
339GB free
Firmware: HP33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 114 114 112 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 161
Write 130
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 114
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 112%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
240GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 79 77 78 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 86.4
Write 82.4
Mixed 57
SusWrite 78.6
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 23.8" 1280 720 HWP3258 HP 24cw
Typical p6-2440el Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6-2440el

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $333
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback