| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 89.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
28 days ago, 28 days ago.
| System | HP Z240 Tower Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | HP 802F |
| Memory | 17.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170502 |
| Uptime | 1.1 Days |
| Run Date | May 08 '24 at 10:35 |
| Run Duration | 116 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 17% |
PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.7%
Good
|
68% 119 Pts
|
49% 393 Pts
|
32% 513 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro M4000
HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
19.9%
Very poor
|
19% 29.3 fps
|
22% 27.2 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$66
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 342 358 356 346 338 MB/s
|
89.4%
Excellent
|
84% 375 MB/s
|
120% 42.9 MB/s
|
182% 264 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
41.7%
Average
|
42% 14.5 GB/s
|
34% 12 GB/s
|
44% 92 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 69 | 57 | 75 | 23" | 1280 720 | HPN347A HP Z23n G2 |
Typical Z240 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 3,230 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z240 Tower Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 1,124x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 354x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 289x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 229x |
| Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 211x |
| Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples | 181x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 83% - Excellent | Total price: $170 |