Acer Predator PH315-53

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-53  (all builds)
MotherboardCML QX50_CMS
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200427
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 08:25
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 111
2-Core 227
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 614
63% 510 Pts
64-Core 762
47% 762 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1441) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
5.4% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 7.5
5% 7.27 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 10.2
7% 7.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.4%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-256G-1014 256GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11101100
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 932
Write 1790
Mixed 1,164
293% 1,295 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 48.8
156% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 770
DQ Write 371
DQ Mixed 493
386% 545 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 179%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
421GB free
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 110 139 138 139 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 110
Write 171
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 134
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GS6AJR8N-XN 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.5% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.6
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 25 144 15.5" 1280 720 LGD061E
Typical Predator PH315-53 Builds (Compare 6,118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback