Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH315-53

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics89.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-53  (all builds)
MotherboardCML QX50_CMS
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210821
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJun 07 '22 at 15:47
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10870H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 130
2-Core 249
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 703
71% 574 Pts
64-Core 960
59% 960 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 1442) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2197 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.8% Excellent
Lighting 117
Reflection 164
Parallax 109
95% 130 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 84.1
Splatting 82.9
79% 99.3 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-256G-1014 256GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11101100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 98 95 92 87 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 886
Write 946
Mixed 192
SusWrite 94.4
117% 530 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 54.2
180% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 234
162% 204 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 106%
Great: 179%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
307GB free
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 145 141 142 143 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 96.9
Write 129
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 143
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 27
92% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 28.5
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-53 Builds (Compare 6,303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback