PC Intel IEM PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics184% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPC Intel IEM PC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING
Memory114.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190805
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 20:56
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 78.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 245
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 839
80% 660 Pts
64-Core 826
51% 826 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
Asus(1043 88EC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
184% Outstanding
Lighting 260
Reflection 243
Parallax 286
212% 263 fps
MRender 327
Gravity 228
Splatting 179
193% 245 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 184%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,386
Write 2,148
Mixed 1,884
476% 2,139 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 54.2
183% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,194
DQ Write 703
DQ Mixed 890
679% 929 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
996GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1523 1947 1924 1923 1934 1956 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 1,623
Write 2,140
Mixed 2137
SusWrite 1,868
440% 1,942 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 78.5
252% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,285
DQ Write 793
DQ Mixed 988
750% 1,022 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 304%
Great: 435%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 209 211 212 216 210 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 128 128 127 129 131 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 183 185 182 181 179 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 103
Write 138
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 180
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 81%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
68.1% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 22.3
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 21.3
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 149%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 165 27" 2560 1440 AUS27E0 ASUS VG27W
Typical Intel IEM PC Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

System: PC Intel IEM PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback